Why is Israel so Dismissive?
The Israeli left is dead. It has been dead for years. With the recent offensive in Gaza and the election of a hard line right government, it looks as though it will not be coming back to life anytime soon. The settlements have not stopped growing and protests in Tel Aviv have not accomplished much. Things have gotten worse and people have gotten tired. They give up out of fatigue and frustration. People in certain circles on the right, on the other hand, have had no problem suffering through intense heat and cold while sitting on windswept hilltops throughout the West Bank in a demonstration of their political views and power. The mainstream left in Israel has lost that spirit a long time ago (perhaps it never had it to begin with) while the direct action left is trying to keep it alive but in small numbers.
Today’s Friday Edition of Haaretz has an Op-Ed piece written by Carlo Strenger, a Tel Aviv University professor entitled “Why Israel’s left has disappeared”. The article highlights what has become a commonplace argument against any and all criticism of Israeli polices in the West Bank and Gaza. Strenger writes,
“Israel’s policies since 1967 are evil stupidity or stupidly evil, and I continue to think that the occupation must end as quickly as possible. But I believe that Israel’s stupidity is matched by the Palestinians making every conceivable mistake along the way, and I think the left should give them the respect of holding them responsible for their actions rather than talking about them as if they were abused children”
The message is clear; Israel is occupying but what the Palestinians are doing is worse. We do bad things but what they do is worse and if you do not call them out on it then there is something wrong with you. Despite the fact that we are the occupying power and the strong military force, the Palestinians deserve all the blame. Leftist who believe otherwise can be pushed to the side for not realizing a simple fact.
The author states that he has a problem with the occupation and that it is, in some sort of way, evil. That is where the argument should end. If you are against the occupation, work to end as an Israeli. Instead he is dismissive and shifts the focus to the Palestinians in the classic liberal Zionist way. Look at what we have done for them and how they have repaid us…
It is absurd to deal with the occupation/settlement debate by stating that the other side is so bad or that other countries have similar problems. These issues have a place in the debate but not the primary one. The real issue is that no one is willing to take responsibility for the blame of the occupation and, more importantly, no one is forcing Israel to take the responsibility. How difficult is it to be a member of the left in a society in which the concept of responsibility is almost nonexistent.
The author of the article argues that the left has failed because it did not provide a realistic picture of the conflict. Perhaps the left is simply no match for the extreme religious nationalism that has overtaken this country. This nationalist mindset has populated the center to such an extent that any critical discussion of Israeli polices are answered with “but they do this or this happens there”.
Also today, an Op-Ed in the Jerusalem Post written by Michael Freund arguing that the left should support the settlement project if peace is the true goal of the movement. The reason for this insane proposition? The Palestinians cannot be trusted and taking as much land as possible is the only sure way that we can guarantee that they will seriously listen to our demands of peace. Implicit in this argument is that Israel can be trusted on its word and that our goal is peace with the Palestinians but that is another story.
Of course neither of these articles touches on the issues of maintaining the occupation itself. The oppression of an entire population under military control, the house raids, administrative detention arrests, the double standards of life in the West Bank (one set of resources for settlers and one set for Palestinians), the humiliation of Palestinians in daily life, the countless acts of setters violence and the moral decay that effects every society, no matter how moral, that occupies another. Have we gotten to the point where calling a spade a spade is impossible?
With recent moves to cut off funding for Israeli NGOs from foreign governments, the climate for discussion in Israel is becoming more and more hostile….
| Print article | This entry was posted by Joseph Dana on 13/08/2009 at 23:24, and is filed under Unarmed Resistance, Villages. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |

about 11 months ago
Yosef,
You Quote Strenger “Israel’s policies since 1967 are evil stupidity or stupidly evil, and I continue to think that the occupation must end as quickly as possible.”
And then you claim that his message is clear, your words – “Despite the fact that we are the occupying power and the strong military force, the Palestinians deserve all the blame.”
I think you should learn to choose you words more carefully, as he clearly states the opposite of what you accuse him of believing.
I will begin to comment on your blog posts when I feel you are making unfounded accusations regarding the beliefs of others. I believe people should be judged based on what they say, and fairly at that.
Aaron
about 11 months ago
Josef – this here is your mirror image namesake. Good entry – I’ve noticed the same thing from Stenger in the past (I read his Guardian Cif posts from time to time). First he comes out as a fellow “leftist” and then it’s on to the “but we have no choice”, or “they are worse”, or “if only we could believe in their promises”, etc. As if the occupied party that has no power has choices to make. Anything to present the occupation as something that Israel really must do for it’s survival. When the reality is that the occupation is what’s bringing Israel’s raison d’etre into question. But that’s the direction they prefer not to see.
Here’s a little historical comparison for you – the claim “but they are worse” is the age old refrain held forth by colonizers from time immemorial. It’s what the conquerors do to salve a pesky moral wound, in lieu of a high moral ground. Examples are legion but my favorite is the Spanish conquistadors’ condemnation of the Incas and the Aztecs – “but they practiced human sacrifice!”, as if that justifies eradicating an entire people and forcefully converting the rest. Then the same accusation can be spread onto the mayas and bingo! we got ourselves a moral casus belli. Never mind that it doesn’t always stick (in the maya’s case). in a battle for the morally fittest, repetition is the lubricant of surviving narratives.
Another example? maybe a closer one – a look at what the turks say about the armenians will provide enough stomach churning material to last a few months. Which is how the Turks presumably still manage to sleep at night. And we are not even going to age old justifications of anti-semitism (though many good lessons there….)
Times and places change but the canard remains – portray the subjugated as barbarians – who really chose their fate by their own actions thereby taking the subjugator “off the hook”. Sort of. Take an atrocity and rebrand as a “good deed’. It’s what we did in Iraq too – saddam was so much worse!! Carlo Stenger is a perfect example of this – as is much of the israeli left. Since this line of argument is a rather empty vessel, the ‘left” dissipates itself for simple lack of conviction. Ultimately the Israeli left cared little for the Palestinians. Aren’t they the ones who kept presenting the arabs as a “demographic threat”? just another empty vessel of an argument. Maybe they just decided the threat is one they could live with – or “solve” when the time comes.
One could only wish there were more on your side.
about 11 months ago
Dana,
You say “As if the occupied party that has no power has choices to make.”
DId you read Strengers Article?
I cant find any irrelevant “but they are worse” arguments there. All his examples go to specific choices the Palestinians made that stonewalled Israeli movements towards peace.
Your comment here actually demonstrates his main point. Rather than consider the possibility that the Palestinians have made mistakes, rather than even attempt to refute it, you declare them powerless.
Aaron
about 11 months ago
Mister Stenger’s argument as I understood it was that the left must convince the center of the wisdom of its path. Your argument is that the Palestinians cannot be expected to make the path of the left any easier. In which case the left must at least warn the public of the difficulty of the path ahead, which they haven’t done.